Vartanama, Mar '15
By Pawan Dhall
On March 17, 2015, the Supreme Court of India struck down a Government of India decision to include the Jat community in the Other Backward Classes (OBC), and said that caste can’t be the sole factor for inclusion in the OBC category. Instead, the apex court asked the government to prioritize “new and emerging” groups like transgender people for inclusion among OBCs and identification for reservation benefits.
By Pawan Dhall
On March 17, 2015, the Supreme Court of India struck down a Government of India decision to include the Jat community in the Other Backward Classes (OBC), and said that caste can’t be the sole factor for inclusion in the OBC category. Instead, the apex court asked the government to prioritize “new and emerging” groups like transgender people for inclusion among OBCs and identification for reservation benefits.
While the suggestion to consider transgender people for
affirmative action is consistent with the Supreme Court’s April 2014 judgment on transgender identities and rights,
what is not clear is how the quota percentages will be worked out. Will
transgender people have a quota beyond the 27% already reserved for inclusion
of OBCs in central government jobs, admission into educational institutions or
other benefits? What if a transgender person belongs to a community already
included in the OBC category? What if they belong to a community that is not
‘backward’?