Advice - Disability, Jan '16
Shampa Sengupta argues that both government and civil society are not living up to their commitment towards women with disabilities
the buck to NGOs and blame them for its own failure to adopt
a state level policy. In the meantime women (and other people) with
disabilities keep facing multiple levels of discrimination and abuse, which
only a strong grassroots people’s movement can end.
Shampa Sengupta is a Kolkata-based activist working on gender and disability issues for more than 25 years. She is the founder of an advocacy group called Sruti Disability Rights Centre and is Executive Committee Member, National Platform for Rights of the Disabled. She will be happy to answer your queries on disability and related issues. Write in your queries to vartablog@gmail.com, and they will be answered with due respect to confidentiality.
Shampa Sengupta argues that both government and civil society are not living up to their commitment towards women with disabilities
Photo credit: Shampa Sengupta |
Rarely do we see news or photographs of
women with disabilities on the front page of any newspaper. So when Ira Singhal
made it to the first page of all the national dailies of India in July last
year, it was a matter of great joy. Ira Singhal, who topped the Union Public Service Commission examination and made all of us proud, talked about the hurdles
she faced in life. According to some media reports, she maintained that her
parents did not bring her up as someone with ‘special’ problems and the
difficulties she faced were more on grounds of gender than disability. Since
this is her personal experience, we believe in her words. However, the majority
of disabled women face multiple levels of discrimination. Sometimes they
articulate the discrimination they face; at other times they perhaps don’t even
understand the inequity and remain in an unaware stage without striving to
change the situation.
The policy and law makers in India did not
give much attention to this issue prior to the discussions, debates and drafting
of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities
(UNCRPD). One may recall here that during the drafting of UNCRPD, there were
debates on whether there would be enough to have a chapter on women with
disabilities or the gender component should run through the text of the convention.
In the end, it was decided that a twin-track approach would be applied and
there would be both a separate chapter as well as mention of women with disabilities
in the other articles of the convention.
Article 6 – Women with Disabilities
mentions: “(1) States Parties recognize that women and girls with disabilities
are subject to multiple discriminations, and in this regard shall take measures
to ensure the full and equal enjoyment by them of all human rights and
fundamental freedoms; (2) States Parties shall take all appropriate measures to
ensure the full development, advancement and empowerment of women, for the
purpose of guaranteeing them the exercise and enjoyment of the human rights and
fundamental freedoms set out in the present Convention”.
It is interesting to note here that the
first ever disability related document in India that specifically mentioned women
with disabilities was the National Policy for Persons with Disabilities which
India adopted in February 2006, just a few months before the UN adopted the
Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. But did this head start
over the UN amount to much?
To quote from the policy document: “According
to Census 2001, there are 93.01 lakh women with disabilities, which constitute
42.46 percent of total disabled population. Women with disabilities require
protection against exploitation and abuse. Special programmes will be developed
for education, employment and providing of other rehabilitation services to
women with disabilities keeping in view their special needs . . .
“Programmes will be undertaken to
rehabilitate abandoned disabled women / girls by encouraging their adoption in
families, support to house them and impart them training for gainful employment
skills. The Government will encourage the projects where representation of
women with disabilities is ensured at least to the extent of twenty five
percent of total beneficiaries.
“Steps shall be taken to provide short
duration stay homes for women with disabilities, hostels for working disabled
women, and homes for aged disabled women.
“It has been noted that women with
disabilities have serious difficulty in looking after their children. The
Government will take up a programme to provide financial support to women with
disabilities so that they may hire services to look after their children. Such
support will be limited to two children for a period not exceeding two years.”
Now, all the issues raised in the policy can’t
be considered written from a rights-based approach – the women’s movements and
disability movements both have enough reasons to criticise the policy. But whatever
be the lacunae, the key point to deplore is the almost zero level of implementation
of the policy, which, quite ironically, says (in Para 62) that “Every five
years a comprehensive review will be done on the implementation of the National
Policy. A document indicating status of implementation and a roadmap for five
years shall be prepared based on the deliberations in a national level convention.
State Governments and Union Territory administrations will be urged to take
steps for drawing up State Policy and develop action.”
Photo credit: Shampa Sengupta |
Almost a decade has passed by, but the governments
at national and state levels have not bothered to review the implementation of the
policy. The saddest part is, of course, that the civil society has remained
completely silent on this. Whereas demands to bring in new legislation on
disability has been made by many, few disability activists have raised the
question why the existing policy has not been implemented or a more basic
demand that the policy needs to be reviewed and reframed even before it is
acted upon.
It is also important to note here that some
of the states have formulated their own policy on disability. The Office of the Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities, West Bengal also promised that they
would formulate a state disability policy, so since 2011-12, there were several
dialogues with the concerned officers about how and when the policy would be
drafted. In a recent conversation with a senior bureaucrat of the concerned
department, I was informed that the state did draft a policy but during
consultations a “very big NGO” objected to the formulation of a state policy
before the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Bill 2012 was passed nationally.
Given the resistance from civil society, the state government doesn’t seem too keen
on adopting the policy for the moment.
So the status of women with disabilities
remains the same – notwithstanding what India promised to the UN, the Rights of
Persons with Disabilities Bill is yet to materialize, the National Policy for
Persons with Disabilities is not implemented, and in West Bengal, the officials
conveniently pass
Shampa Sengupta is a Kolkata-based activist working on gender and disability issues for more than 25 years. She is the founder of an advocacy group called Sruti Disability Rights Centre and is Executive Committee Member, National Platform for Rights of the Disabled. She will be happy to answer your queries on disability and related issues. Write in your queries to vartablog@gmail.com, and they will be answered with due respect to confidentiality.
No comments:
Post a Comment