People, Dec '13
By Pawan Dhall and Sukanya Roy Ghose
In this issue we begin with the first part of an
interview with Dr. Tirthankar Guha Thakurta, a medical doctor, 30 years old,
resident of Kolkata. The interview was conducted by Pawan Dhall on August 6,
2013, and transcribed by freelancer Sukanya Roy Ghose.
Artwork source: tshirt-factory.com
By Pawan Dhall and Sukanya Roy Ghose
Varta brings you the 'Queer Kolkata Oral History Project', an
initiative to document five decades of queer lives in Kolkata (1960-2000). Our
aim in this project is to go back in time and bring forward diverse queer voices
through a series of interviews, which will provide a landmark to Kolkata city's
queer history. Typically, the focus will be on the queer scenario in Kolkata
during the growing up years of each interviewee – how it was to be queer in
Kolkata in different decades since the 1960s till more recent times. The effort
will be to bring forward a mix of the well known and the lesser known voices. Apart
from the excerpts published here, the project also aims to publish a collection
of the interviews in different formats. All interviews are based on informed
consent and where requested, all markers of identity have been removed for
reasons of confidentiality.
Pawan: So, Tirthankar, let’s start by you talking something
about yourself. What do you do? How old are you? And something about your
family . . .
Tirthankar: Okay. I am a doctor by profession. I teach at a medical
college in Kolkata and I am 30 years old, as of now. I live with my mother. I was
born and brought up in a joint family with many family members. It’s been only
the last two years that I left my ancestral home and now living, not exactly in a
nuclear family, because we are in touch, but living separately with my mother.
Otherwise the last 27-28 years of my life, I have been in a joint family. And
now in my family, there’s one new family member, my pet, Bravo.
Pawan: Alright, so you mentioned your profession as that of a
doctor . . . But is that really a complete description of yourself?
Tirthankar (with a chuckle): May not be . . . I like teaching, so I
teach at the medical college. Also in private I have an institution, where I
give tuitions to students other than my own medical college, on various aspects
of medicine. I have been conducting various workshops on gender-sexuality and
medicine with various NGOs, CBOs and medical colleges. And as a passion, I make
short films. I have been making films from 2003-04. The first film was made in
association with SAATHII Calcutta. It was called Piku Is Fine or Piku Bhalo Aachhey. And then a number of films followed. I plan to make films in future
also.
Pawan: Okay, what was your motivation behind getting into
making films?
Tirthankar: The first motivation, I should say, more than making a
film, was to raise a voice. In 2003-04, there was not much of any active talk
about gay rights. That, you Pawan, might know, because you have been working on
the issue much before that. So not all media were very supportive, or writing
very clean documents with very good intentions. So I thought raising a voice
was important – as a person who is gay, as a person who wants to be a part of
the movement that is going on, and as a doctor . . . from the responsibility of
a doctor also I need to make a document that can clearly narrate to people,
doctors and non-doctors, about what is homosexuality, what homosexual people
think of homosexuality, to break the common prejudices. And film was only a
medium to channelize my thoughts and words . . . it could have been a play . .
. it could have been anything else.
Pawan: Right, but it turned out to be a landmark film . . . because
as you said that all media was not totally sensitized even at that stage and
films definitely, even My Brother Nikhil had not been made till then and there
had been other queer-themed films which had touched upon sexuality in different
aspects . . . but I think Piku Bhalo Aachhey was quite a record in itself. So
what were the avenues? Where was the film shown?
Tirthankar: The first screening, I remember, was in Bangalore.
There was an international conference on sexuality and masculinity. So I
attended it with other members of SAATHII, Anupam and you Pawan Da. After that first
screening, the first formal inauguration, I think, happened in Max Mueller
Bhavan, where the Siddhartha Gautam Film Festival screened that film with some
other films. After that it has been screened at various ‘in-country’ and
outside country festivals and at the same time also in the Kolkata Film
Festival in Nandan.
Pawan: Right, you had a very enthusiastic response when it was
shown in the Kolkata Film Festival . . .
Tirthankar: Yes, the response was enthusiastic. People from the
media and trade also contacted me separately, numerous interviews were
published, and my formal coming out in the media occurred when an interview in The
Telegraph, in the page of Leisure I think was published.
Pawan: So what happened then at home?
Tirthankar: At home not everybody knew that I was gay. My mother
knew, but was not confident to speak about it. My cousins knew, but their
parents did not know for sure. So when suddenly one morning they found that in
a very popular newspaper like The Telegraph my picture is there, the initial response
was that of surprise and happiness, that there is something written about our
son. But then when the contents were gradually being read, not everyone was
equally happy or unhappy. There was a mixed reaction.
Some people supported but were even scared about other
people’s response. Or about how I might face it in the larger society or at the
medical college, because I was in the third year of medical college by then. I
started making the film when I was in second year, and I was already in third year
when these things were happening. There were two more years to go in the same
college, not counting the internship. So how my professors and friends would
react was also another issue. In summary, things went on well. There was a
mixed reaction, I survived well (laughs).
Pawan: Any examples of any good or negative reactions?
Tirthankar: Yes, there were negative reactions, of course. Some
relatives would come up to my mother, sometimes sympathizing, that it is a sad
event that her son is gay, and that she had read it being portrayed in the
newspaper. And my mother would often cry, not because I am gay, but because of
these kinds of sympathizing. Then she would be made to feel that she should feel
guilty, when she did not feel guilty at the beginning.
Pawan: Right.
Tirthankar: So there was a mixed reaction. There were occasional
fights with me – again, not for my being gay, but my being so loud about
being gay. And then, she also transformed. She changed into a very caring and understanding
mother, and one day she could give an answer. One day, I remember, the same
lady who would constantly nag her for me being gay, when she came up for
another article that came out in another newspaper, saying that this article
was very clean because it did not mention my being gay. It only mentioned my
film.
Pawan: Okay . . .
Tirthankar: Then my mother told her that in the past also there
were instances where people spoke against society or norms, like Raja Rammohan
Roy or Vidyasagar. At that point of time, they were also criticized. But now we
respect them and their work is seen as landmark. She did not claim that her son
was equivalent to them, but said that she was happy that I was encouraged by
these examples and following a similar path. So I was very happy when that answer
was given.
Pawan: Wonderful. I am also remembering these things because
you had shared them earlier too.
Tirthankar: My uncle had a good response. My uncle initially was
very homophobic, not knowing there are many surprises coming (laughs). But
later, when these articles were published, somehow, his idea of what a gay
person is changed. After making the film, I found that he was no more making
very loose comments on gays, on effeminate males being subjects of ridicule. So
the way he commented, changed. Initially, a very conventional word like chhakka
was used very loosely, not in a very lucid manner by my uncle. But now he
recognized that these words can hurt people, it is not just a funny word. And the
dealings with these issues gradually changed. I also remember him lending help
in issues where violence occurred to one transgender person and her partner. So
he was very actively participating in that entire issue. That was a big change.
Pawan: You said you are 30 years old, which means your teenage
years would have been around when?
Tirthankar: I was born in 1982. So my teenage years if counted from
12 or 13 onwards, that would be mathematically from '95-'96 . . .
Pawan: So, it was not that long ago, but still do you have
anything specific to say about growing up realizing that you are gay, or
is there anything special that you would like to mention?
Tirthankar: Yes, I would like to mention a few changes I have
noticed in me and also in my surroundings, not necessarily that the changes in
me were influenced by my surroundings. It could have been spontaneous,
irrespective of the time period when I was born. One thing is that the more I have
grown up I have realized that being gay was as normal as anything else, and we
are not fighting for extra rights, but equal rights. So gradually this is, as I
would call, a post-gay phase . . . where the fact that I am gay doesn't matter
much, and it is as equally useful as any other information about my life.
So earlier, when I was very insistent about giving
interviews on my being gay, now I am more interested about talking about gay
rights but not about my being gay, which does not mean I am ashamed of playing
that angle . . . That is one step, I have grown out of being just gay . . .
Second change in me, maybe it’s a very bad change. Post
2009, my film-making career has halted. The urge to make very dramatic films on
gay rights, because things are not spoken of, has changed, because things are
picking up, which I consider to be a very positive change. So may be, this
time, if I make a film, it may not always be on hard core gay issues, but it
can have a gay character, just like any other character in the film. So there
is a change in my way of looking at films.
Third is, people now are actively talking of gay issues
irrespective of their own sexual orientations. I find many people, who are my
students or my friends, are coming up with questions, which are very
intelligent, very inquisitive and they are not ashamed to ask questions on
sexuality. This change was not seen before.
This has been a part of the activism by many people, also by
the very positive approach taken by the media for the last few years. A few
media in particular who are getting to know things and asking the right
questions, which is a very positive approach . . .
I remember, in one of my medical classes, one boy was giving
some example of a medical condition. We were talking about some psychological
delusion, something called a ‘delusion of love’, where you think that you are
intensely in love with someone, with whom you do not have a physical or
emotional contact, like a big actor or someone. So, when we were discussing
this stuff, someone, erroneously may be, I don’t know about his sexual
orientation, he mentioned, “For example, if I say that I love him . . .” When
he mentioned this, many people in the class laughed. Others did not. So, after
this, I made a very funny comment. I said that those people who laughed also
have a delusion. It is called the ‘delusion of universal heterosexuality’. Then
the remainder of the class laughed. And at the end of the class, although the
topic was entirely different – we were talking about schizophrenia; but at the
end of the class, most of the questions were on homosexuality.
To be continued.
Pawan Dhall aspires to be a rainbow journalist and believes
in taking a stand, even if it’s on the fence – the view is better from there!
Sukanya Roy Ghose is a Jadavpur University pass-out,
bonafide homemaker, mother of twin sons, interested in playing with paper and
pen, designing and experimental cooking.
This made a great read! Love the way his mom snubbed the relative :)
ReplyDeleteThis is a great quote: "I said that those people who laughed also have a delusion. It is called the ‘delusion of universal heterosexuality’ I see this becoming a catch phrase. Great job from the interviewers and from Tirthankar. A pleasure and an education to read about his gradual evolution into who he is today with a promise of who he will grow into ...